What to Know About Japan’s Plan to Release Fukushima Water Into the Ocean_我的网站
A |
Japan as soon as this week will begin the controversial release of treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant into the ocean.
The Japanese government approved the plan two years ago, saying it is necessary to decommission the power plant, which is operated by Tokyo Electric Power Company. Releases will start Thursday “if they encounter no obstacles,” Prime Minister Fumio Kishida announced this week.
“I have asked TEPCO to swiftly prepare for the water discharge in accordance with the plan approved by the Nuclear Regulation Authority, and expect the water release to start on Aug. 24, weather conditions permitting,” Kishida said.
Despite pushback from neighboring nations and fishing groups, Japanese officials said the plan is safe.
What Is the Release Process?
The wastewater has gone through treatment and is stored in large tanks. Japanese officials say the water needs to be removed so the plant can be decommissioned.
The water will be diluted and released through an underwater tunnel off the coast of Japan. Officials say it will not be near areas where routine fishing occurs.
The entire process is expected to take decades.
Is the Treated Water Safe?
The release plan has been approved by Japan’s nuclear regulation agency and given the go-ahead by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the global nuclear watchdog.
The IAEA’s two-year review of the plan – which involved sampling and testing the treated water – found it to be consistent with the agency’s safety standards with “negligible” impacts to humans and the environment.
“Based on its comprehensive assessment, the IAEA has concluded that the approach and activities to the discharge of ALPS treated water taken by Japan are consistent with relevant international safety standards,” IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said in a statement last month.
“Furthermore, the IAEA notes the controlled, gradual discharges of the treated water to the sea, as currently planned and assessed by TEPCO, would have a negligible radiological impact on people and the environment,” he added.
The agency will monitor the water’s release and have a continuous presence on-site at the discharge facility.
“This will ensure the relevant international safety standards continue to be applied throughout the decades-long process laid out by the Government of Japan and TEPCO,” Grossi said.
Nearly all radioactivity has been removed from the treated water – except tritium.
Tritium is a radioactive form of hydrogen that occurs naturally and is also a byproduct of producing electricity at nuclear power plants. It cannot be filtered out of the nuclear wastewater.
Japan plans to dilute the water to bring the level of tritium below regulatory standards. This practice is done at other nuclear power plants, including in the U.S.
One of the biggest critics of the plan is Beijing, a top consumer of exports from Japanese fisheries. Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin recently called Japan’s decision “selfish and irresponsible.”
“In disregard of the strong concerns and firm opposition from the international community, the Japanese government announced the decision to start releasing the Fukushima nuclear-contaminated water into the ocean from Aug. 24,” Wang said during a press conference this week, according to a transcription. “This is extremely selfish and irresponsible, as the discharge will spread the risks of nuclear contamination to the rest of the world. And by doing so, Japan is putting its selfish interests above the long-term well being of the entire humanity. China is gravely concerned and strongly opposed to this.”
Hong Kong’s leader this week said the city would "immediately activate" import controls on Japanese seafood to begin on Thursday – the same day as the planned water release.
South Korean activists have also protested the plan, but Seoul recently concluded from its own study that there aren’t any scientific issues.
"Our government has judged that the Japanese side will discharge the contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant as originally planned and has determined that there are no scientific or technical problems with the planned discharge of the contaminated water," Office for Government Policy Coordination Park First Deputy Park Ku-yeon said this week.
Asked about the situation during a trilateral meeting with President Joe Biden and Prime Minister Kishida at Camp David last week, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol answered diplomatically but with obvious concern – assigning the issue the “highest priority” and calling for transparency.
“The Fukushima plant's treated water, if it's going to have some type of impact, it would flow through the entire Pacific Ocean having an impact not just on our three countries but all countries around the world,” Yoon said through a translator. “As such, for the sake of safety and health of the people of our three countries and all members of the international community, that should be something that we need to place the highest priority on. Regarding this treated water, based on scientific principles, all of the processing should be carried out accordingly. And at the same time, internationally recognized and reliable IAEA's investigation results are something that we can trust. And I would like to make sure that everything is conducted and carried out in accordance with the procedures established by the IAEA.”
Japan’s plan has faced strong opposition from local fishing groups.
Kishida met with leaders of the Japanese fishery industry on Monday to pledge long-term support for fishing communities.
But Masanobu Sakamoto, head of the National Federation of Fisheries Cooperatives, said his group remained opposed to the plan, even though some members have gained confidence about its safety.
“Scientific safety and the sense of safety are different,” Sakamoto said. “Even if it’s safe, reputational damage occurs.”
What Was the 2011 Fukushima Disaster?
A magnitude 9.0 earthquake off the coast of Japan triggered a tsunami that hit the Fukushima power plant, triggering meltdowns in three reactors that contaminated the cooling water.
The accident was given the highest rating on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale due to the high radioactive releases from the plant.
C | 他手里原本攥着4230万美元的球员选项，完全可以一签了事，但他没有。哈登选择降薪续约，新合同年薪预计落在2500万至3200万之间，每年直接让利超过1200万。这笔钱，最终变成了沃特森加盟克利夫兰的薪资空间。
为什么骑士如此执着于一个场均14.6分的年轻人？答案藏在去年东部决赛里。面对尼克斯的锋线群，骑士的三号位被反复针对，攻防两端全面失血。米切尔和莫布利锁定顶薪，阿伦镇守内线，后场有哈登梳理进攻，唯独缺少一个能跑能防、能把空位三分投进的侧翼。沃特森恰恰是联盟当下最稀缺的类型——2米03的身高，能从1号位换防到4号位，三分命中率41.1%，场均还能送出1.1次盖帽。这种体型配机动性，放在自由市场上，至少五支球队排队等着递合同。
掘金并非不想留人。
D | 他们开出了5年7000万的报价，年均1400万，但在沃特森团队眼里，这个数字严重低估了他的市场价值。更关键的是，掘金刚刚匹配了雷霆给斯潘塞·琼斯的邀请合同，薪资已经顶到第二土豪线。
E | 如果强行给沃特森涨到年均2200万，奢侈税将直奔2亿美元。对一支围绕约基奇建队、争冠窗口期有限的球队来说，这笔账怎么算都不划算。
于是掘金选择了变现。他们从这笔先签后换交易中拿回了骑士2031年的无保护首轮签，外加国王2032年的次轮签。无保护三个字的分量极重——这意味着五年后如果骑士因为哈登退役、米切尔老化而跌入乐透区，掘金将白捡一个高顺位新秀。这是一场关于时间维度的对赌：掘金赌未来，骑士赌现在。
骑士的筹码不止是选秀权。为了让薪资空间腾出来，管理层在过去一周连续做了多笔操作。先把施罗德送往黄蜂换回特雷·曼恩，省下约680万美元；接着把斯特鲁斯摆上货架，这位上季场均11.2分、三分命中率40.2%的射手，手里握着1666万的到期合同。骑士从7月就开始兜售，先后接触过公牛和篮网，但对方一听要接最后一年的高薪，扭头就走。
F | 直到快船入局，用交易特例直接吃下这份合同，整笔账才算彻底平掉。
快船在这笔五方交易中几乎没付出核心资产，仅靠薪资空间就拿到了一位有硬仗基因的成熟射手。
G | 唯一的隐患在斯特鲁斯的左脚——上季他因琼斯骨折只打了12场常规赛，季后赛带伤复出。快船医疗组的评估报告，将直接决定这笔交易最终的成色。
当交易正式官宣时，外界才发现它已经扩展成五方九人的大交易。骑士最终入账沃特森和惠特摩尔两名锋线，快船拿到斯特鲁斯，掘金收下2031年无保护首轮、国王2032年次轮和里斯，奇才得到曼恩和次轮签，黄蜂得到施罗德。由于骑士和掘金都参与了先签后换，两队被第一土豪线硬帽锁死。骑士在完成哈登续约前，距离硬帽还剩约2900万美元空间——这2900万，恰好是留给哈登的。
哈登的牺牲，远超外界的想象。
H | 一个11届全明星、前MVP，在职业生涯尾巴上做出降薪4000万的决定，图的就是那座迟迟未到手的总冠军奖杯。他深知，骑士管理层整个夏天的操作逻辑，本质上是在和时间赛跑。米切尔和莫布利的顶薪合同已经生效，阿伦的续约谈判也即将启动，未来几年球队的薪资空间只会越来越紧。如果这个窗口期拿不下冠军，等哈登老去、新人磨合失败，骑士将同时失去现在和未来。
ESPN给骑士打了B级，给掘金打了D级。不少美国记者认为掘金是最大输家，但换个角度看，掘金管理层只是选择了一条更稳妥的路。约基奇的合同窗口就剩几年，硬留沃特森会让后续操作空间彻底焊死，还不如换回一个远端首轮给未来留种子。掘金转头就去接触德罗赞，说明他们根本没打算躺平。
骑士球迷有理由兴奋，但别高兴太早。沃特森功能单一的问题客观存在，他能靠身体天赋在常规赛冲击篮筐，可到了总决赛级别的肉搏战，能否扛住对手王牌锋线的强吃，依然是个问号。更现实的是，骑士总薪资已经顶到硬帽，后续连一笔像样的补强都做不了。
I | 轮换深度被锁死，一旦主力遭遇伤病，替补席上能指望的名字屈指可数。
纸面实力上，哈登、米切尔、沃特森、莫布利、阿伦这套首发，足以叫板尼克斯和76人。
K |
掘金拿着2031年的首轮签看向远方，快船拿着斯特鲁斯看向他的左脚康复报告，骑士拿着沃特森看向当下。三支球队在同一张交易单上签了字，赌的是完全不同的时间维度。骑士把未来五年的选秀资产押在了哈登巅峰尾巴的这两三年，赌赢了就是队史第二座总冠军奖杯，赌输了就是2031年那个无保护首轮变成乐透区高顺位白白送给丹佛。
哈登降薪1200万，换来的是一个23岁的锋线。这笔买卖对当下的克利夫兰绝对划算，但对未来五年的骑士而言，答案要等到2031年才能真正揭晓。
Current article:http://xia0s.yepenchunshouzuiwai.shop/list_khoiexm/hsibl.html
改革“林”距离 |从“守青山”到“兑碳金”——滦河林场的兴林富民记
女单“种子”张帅轻松过温网首轮
1.3万支大学生暑期社会实践团队下沉一线 把课堂搬到基层 在服务中长才干
'पत्रकारों की हत्या चौंकाने वाली', गाजा के अस्पताल में हमले के बाद आया भारत का रिएक्शन
因受台风“梅花〞 影响，西湖游船停航
Japanese PM sends ritual offering to notorious Yasukuni Shrine
查看所有0条评论>>